akg k702 frequency response graph

Here, you can find also very good review of DT880 and K702 – must read!. A test that I perform now and then (mostly only when I suspect issues) is the linearity test. The effect of this filter is shown below. Most people won’t hear a difference between those two models. The open-back ear cups are well padded and covered in a suede-like fabric that gives the headphones a more premium appeal. The K702 is an open headphone with a dynamic driver. The large ear cups easily fit around most ears, and the headband design does not put much pressure on the head. Some headphones will go as wide as 5Hz – 40,000Hz, however from 20,000Hz additional range doesn’t matter much, because we can’t hear those frequencies anyway. Driver type: dynamic You need to drive it from a amplifier or source that can provide enough voltage into 62Ω. It powered my old AKG K500 enough to even give it some more slam in the low-end. I do not use smoothing because some info about sound quality is lost when plots are smoothed. AKG Pro Audio K702 Over-Ear, … As the K702 is not a high efficiency headphone this too suggests it is not designed for portable usage. I had one and I stumbled on it by accident/luck. Note: the rather large ‘dip’ aroound 3.5kHz in the K7XX (and K712) are a measurement error because there is no pinna. When they eventually do graph … ... i.e. Also the treble is about 2dB lower which makes the K712 a bit more ‘laidback’ and ‘smoother’ sounding. Impedance: 65Ω See our recommendations for the best headphones for music, the best over-ear headphones, and the best headphones for studio. The signal doesn’t follow the stimulus in the horizontal plane and quickly drops down. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. The treble response is a bit ‘jagged’ and has a typical ‘AKG signature’. The Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO and the AKG K702 are both great headphones for critical listeners and have very little difference in performance. The open back ear cups are large and circular and covered in a suede-like padding that gives the headphones a premium appeal. However, the AKG are well-built but don’t feel as durable since they don’t have a full metal frame like the Beyerdynamic. Ultra Cheap Amp for Akg K702 Under 50$ or should I get easier to drive headphones. The headband can adjust over a wide range but isn’t padded. Their frequency response balance is … In order to get an idea of the headphones you're most likely to enjoy, it's important to also understand how different frequency response ranges impact sound signature. A guide to reading frequency response graphs of headphones and IEMs. It means that they are able to output these frequencies. However, the Q701 are more expensive for such a marginal difference. Frequency Response Graph Unfortunately I can’t find a frequency graph for the K612 (at the time of writing) – so I’ve used the K702 and K601 graphs – mainly because it fairly closely matches what I think I’m hearing. In keeping with tradition, AKG’s fixed-length headband is the first showcase of this design philosophy. so that you can compare the results easily. Some people will be disappointed this headphone only has a 3-pin mini XLR plug because this headphone cannot be connected to balanced amplifiers. Below the K702 vs the K501.The K501 is an oldie. (website links), Foobar 2000 for Dummies (Part 1) – General Setup, Foobar 2000 for Dummies (Part 2) – Playing DSD – New SACD plugin (0.9.x and 1.x.x Series), power, efficiency, levels, balanced, impedance. Some experiments were done on the K701 and will be the same for the K702. Max. frequency response graphs, CSD waterfall plots, subjective gear reviews. When they eventually do graph the 612 I’ll update the chart. Inner pad dimensions: Ø 60mm , depth front: 20mm, depth rear: 25mm The K371 has titanium-coated drivers and a greater frequency response extending from 5Hz-40kHz compared to the K361's 15Hz-28kHz frequency response. Each had those annoying head band bumps that a lot of people complained about. It is not the older ‘Austrian made’ one for those that wonder. On the right side the K702 with the filter.The bass roll-off is easy to see in the 40Hz square-wave. We purchase our own headphones and The flatter the frequency response – … Ramblings. It shows no linearity issues at all, they all overlay. Poor leakage. Gain early access to all tests results for new products, Prices will now be listed directly in reviews and tables, Have 5 votes per product category to choose which product we’ll review next, Gain unlimited access to detailed test results in tools and results (no blurred results), Best Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds For Running, Best Noise Cancelling Headphones Under $200, Best Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds Under $50, Best Noise Cancelling Earbuds And In-Ears, Best Wireless Bluetooth Headphones Under $100, Best Noise Cancelling Headphones Under $100, Video: The 3 Best Gaming Headsets For PS5 (2021), Wyze Noise-Cancelling Headphones Wireless Test Results, EPOS GTW 270 Hybrid Truly Wireless Review, Having trouble deciding between two headphones? Related: AKG K701 vs. K702 ... AKG K701 or K702 is the Subsekt go to's. The output resistance of the used source/amplifier has NO practical influence on the sound. Female vocals are a bit more forward on the DT 880 Pro; sometimes the K7xx places acoustic instruments in front of female vocals, not that this is inherently a bad thing. Fresh pads vs somewhat compressed pads. The MSRP is around €350.- but retail price (2019) is around €140.-. Below the K702 vs the K7XX.The K702 is much more ‘brighter’ but is lacking in the lower bass. This makes the bass sound ‘light’ but ‘tight’. There is only one big downside (which is still a problem with similar looking AKG models) which is the elastic bands loose their elasticity over a few years already. Those that are wondering what happens with the K702 when slapping on a pair of, not angled, memory foam filled K712 pads can see the effect below. Hello world! (lots of) hair between the headphone and ear or an ear shape that does not allow a proper seal will affect the tonal balance. I found this (look at the top review, by gabrielnorena) where the user owns both the 65th anniversary edition and the K712, their description of the difference sort of matches your frequency response chart above for the k712 vs k702 with … Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. AKG K702. A give away for the left cup is the cable entry as well. Related: AKG K701 vs. K702 They elastic bands be replaced but is expensive and not easy to DIY. Upper treble is 1dB higher in level though. The K7XX is much less bright and sharp sounding and relatively bassier as a result. The retro headband design is also quite large and results in a headphone that's cumbersome to carry around, and that will only fit in a backpack. Even in the bass distortion is below 1% which is good for a dynamic driver. Advertising enquiries. The distortion is quite low. These are potential weak points where the headphones could get damaged through wear and tear. : 113dB The incredible soundstage, clarity, and instrument separation makes the AKG an astounding headphone. (Left and Right are superimposed) The narrow treble peaks (7kHz, 12kHz and 16kHz) are resonances. Add to that the K702 is an open headphone and that it does not play sufficiently loud from phones/tablets and cheap DAPs makes it obvious this headphone is only really suited for home and studio usage. The AKG 702 are very comfortable headphones. 10. share. Poor isolaton. However, they pretty big and bulky for everyday use. It lacks in ‘finesse’ but is above average in quality. In terms of the AKG k702 and k712, both are problematic for translation, but they are useful in other ways I'm sure. This means that the sound from the outside world can play inside the earcups and vice versa. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. This is described HERE in more detail. By contrast, the K712s are much smoother through this frequency region and, as a consequence, are more revealing of detail in the mix. As the pads remain firm for quite a long time the change will go unnoticed I reckon. It sounds a bit too bright and can have a shrill ‘edge’ with some music. Think of it as flavours, like in ice-cream. Immediately after unpacking this device, it’s easy to appreciate the aesthetics. The K702 is very similar to the K701 with the only real differences being the color scheme, the replaceable cable and the slightly angled pads which the K701 doesn’t have. Cable: 3m terminated in 6.3mm TRS + 3.5mm adapter According to response graphs, these are are much flatter than the K702 from 80Hz all the way up to 7kHz ... AKG K702: Industry standard openback headphones. Each had those annoying head band bumps that a lot of people complained about. They're not designed for sports and only stay in place during casual listening sessions. Build quality is decent for the AKG K702. Another small difference is that Q701 comes with a Quincy Jones line logo on the earcups that close the cups, but that doesn't seem to make any noticeable difference in our measurements. A Commenter. The K702's are reference, open, over-ear studio headphones for precision listening, mixing and mastering. Back to Graph Database. Not designed for sports. Quand on passe de l’un à l’autre la première sensation est que le AKG … AKG K702. They have the same retro design with large circular ear cups and a headband with a self-adjusting strap. The most interesting part is that the resonances shift a bit because the ear/driver distance changes. There is also no case or pouch, which is disappointing. The AKG K702 and the Beyerdynamic DT 880 are both great audiophile headphones if you like a neutral sound. The AKG K702 and the Philips SHP9500 are both great audiophile headphones if you like a neutral sound. The AKG K702 are slightly better headphones than the AKG K701, but overall are very similar. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. 'neutral', whereby all the frequencies are reproduced at roughly the same level across the audio spectrum), but after a few days of constantly working with them I became disenchanted because they sounded somewhat veiled … The resonances shift in frequency when the ear-driver distance changes. They can sound a bit too harsh and piercing for some people though, so the Philips are a better option if you prefer a smoother sound, without losing much detail. The filtered K702 (the right plots) show the overshoot is removed but there still is a second pulse. The reviewed headphone has had quite a few hours on it already and was kindly sent in by the owner. As this is a dynamic headphone the frequency response might be amplifier output resistance dependent when certain higher output resistance amplifiers are used. They have fairly similar sound profiles, although the AKG adds a bit of extra emphasis to the clarity and detail of vocals and instruments, while the Beyerdynamic emphasize more of the sibilance range. The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. When a product is discontinued or no longer popular, we sell the purchased products locally in Montreal, Canada. The vast majority of the brightness is removed. ... As for the K702 it is mostly used for mid to high frequency referencing, the bass response is really nonexistent. Below the spectrum plot of the K702 (Right channel). AKG K701 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots ... As far as I can tell, the 65th AE seems to sound pretty similar to the K701 graphs on here, but with the advertised additional bass. The bright ‘neutral’ signature can be improved by EQ or as described above. Given its low sensitivity a balanced amplifier could well be beneficial. Here you can vote for our next review, Compare graphs from our headphones test results in order to make a clearer and more informed decision, We buy our own products to test. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. They're not made for commuting or to use at the gym but are ideal for appreciating high-quality audio in a quiet environment. The small ‘bump’ around 2kHz makes the mids sound a bit too ‘forward’ but not in an annoying way. The headphone feels and is quite sturdy. and the same isolation level as K701. IMPROVED SOUNDSTAGE & RESPONSE Tweaked to deliver an extended frequency response and a wide locationally specific soundstage these headphones put you closer to your music than ever before INSPIRED BY A LEGEND Based on the AKG K702 65th-anniversary-edition headphone this rendition features the same dynamic driver technology and superior build quality—plus a few … Too unstable and cumbersome for use while doing any strenuous physical activity. The K702 is also a fantastic purchase, and has a bit of a different sound signature. You can see what products we currently have for sale. The 5dB ‘dip’ around kHz is audible and makes the K712 sound a bit less ‘edgy’ / ‘forward’. This video sums up the Philips Fidelio X2hr, especially the frequency response graph. The K702 is also a fantastic purchase, and has a bit of a different sound signature. The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. voltage: 3.5V Above 10kHz the resonances are visible but are also short. Frequency Response Graph Unfortunately I can’t find a frequency graph for the K612 (at the time of writing) – so I’ve used the K702 and K601 graphs – mainly because it fairly closely matches what I think I’m hearing. AKG K612. A horizontal line shows audible neutral response in the plots on this website. See frequency response graph. akg k712 graph February 15, 2021. ... the pads on my K702 are squished to hell. The Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO and the AKG K702 are both great headphones for critical listeners and have very little difference in performance. The pads are large enough in inner diameter (60mm) and have a nice depth (25mm) so most ears will fit. The AKG K702 is a modernised K701. AKG Pro Audio K702 is an open-back and over-ear headphone. The K501 rolls-off a lot sooner though and is really bass-shy where the K702 still can reproduce lower bass notes, albeit at a lower than neutral level. power rating: 0.2W (200mW) When you look at the two versions of the graphs at headphone.com here is the result: 20Hz -> 20kHz low end peak/bottom - high end peak/bottom difference: k702 Default version: 6dB Raw version: 20dB k712 Default version: 14dB Comparison Tools. Nom. Vivamus gravida January 19, 2016. Demo units courtesy of: Frequency Response measurements and graphs for In-Ear Monitors (IEMs) and earphones. Above 300Hz the distortion remains below 0.5%. The AKG K702 share the same style and build as the AKG K701 and AKG K712 PRO. Sound-wise, the AKG might lack a bit of sub-bass when compared to the Beyerdynamic and could sound a bit sharper on higher frequencies. Excellent sound quality for neutral listening. The roll-off in the leakage above 4KHz is rather uncharacteristic of most open headphones. type: open back fit: circumaural (over ear) impedance: 250 Ohms frequency response: 5 Hz – 35,000 Hz material: velour ear pads, rugged plastic, metal headband: spring steel, soft cushioning … vs. AKG K712 Pro. ... the extremely linear frequency response range means these headphones aren’t going to impress lovers of loud volumes and big bass changes. Usage: Home, Studio These headphones are not designed for everyday, casual use. Below the K702 vs the K612.The K612 (a better extended K601) is considered ‘neutral’ with a forward sound and sharpish treble. Frequency Response. They combine an extremely accurate response with agility and spaciousness. Pinna gain ‘fills-in’ the gap for the largest portion. Both units extend well beyond what the typical adult ear is able to perceive, so a more palpable difference is in weight. Again, this can be seen on frequency response graphs for all of the AKG K7** series headphones, and it manifests in the sound occasionally. The AKG K7XX (red) is a Drop only product. The AKG K701 look almost identical to the K702 and K712 PRO. Although these headphones are quite loud and leak a lot, the profile of the leakage is narrower that most open headphones we have measured. AKG K702. Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. Both headsets use identical Varimotion 30mm XXL transducers with a 15Hz-40kHz frequency response, making them sound nearly identical. Equipment Forums. The open-back ear cups are well padded and covered in a suede-like fabric that gives the headphones a more premium appeal. The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. To test this the headphone is measured via a low impedance amplifier (0.2Ω) and a high impedance amplifier (120Ω). Frequency response range – Most of the headphones will have at least 20Hz – 20,000Hz (5Hz – 20kHz) frequency response range. Driver size: ø 40mm On the other hand, the AKG don't feel as tight as the Beyerdynamic, which is more comfortable for … A Frequency Response graph is not in any way an indication of good sound quality. The headphone is light in weight. This creates a decent seal which slowly conforms to the head over the years. And by Over-ear, It means that the earcups of this headphone cover the whole ears of the users. The jagged response above 5kHz makes the treble a bit ‘coarse’. put them under the same test bench, On the left from top to bottom 40Hz, 440Hz square wave and on the bottom a 100μs wide DC impulse. © 2021 9298-5266 Quebec Inc. All Rights Reserved. Perhaps the only real difference is color and the fixed cable to justify the price difference. Above 1KHz, there is a 3dB/Octave roll-off present, which won't be effective in blocking outside noise. The clamping force is medium and pleasant but this particular headphone has already been worn for quite some time. The K702 get a bit more bass but also sound brighter - unfortunately, to the point of sounding a bit sharp. Audio Frequency Bandwidth 12-39500 Hz 10-39800 Hz 10 ... 1MORE E1001 Triple Driver, queste AKG K702 con il cavo in sostituzione a quello originale, Beyerdynamic DT990 Pro, FiiO X5 III e FiiO A5. This is achieved by using revolutionary flat-wire voice coils and a … Their sound profiles are fairly similar overall, but the AKG sound even brighter. Their open design doesn't block any noise and leaks enough to be distracting. The fact that it has a long cable suggests it is not intended for portable usage. The AKG K702 is a sturdy work horse. The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. It is often mentioned the K702 is ‘hard to drive’ which is nonsense. Accessories: 3.5mm adapter. The AKG K702 share the same style and build as the AKG K701 and AKG K712 PRO. The mids look better as the measured signal looks more like the applied square-wave but does show overshoot and a lot of ringing. The ringing goes on for quite some time and is seen in the entire plot. Isolation: low (open headphone) They have dense ear cups, and their headband design is flexible enough to handle an above average amount of physical stress. The elegant design demonstrates a deft interplay of material, form and functionality. Max. It's been a love and hate relationship with my AKG K702 until I stumbled upon your post. Weight: 235 g. They have two-tone navy blue and silver color scheme and an old-school retro design that will work for some. Above 18kHz the response drops off quickly but still shows response at least up to 30kHz. The schematic for it is shown below. The FR is like the branding at the side of the tub telling you the flavour of the ice cream. Only when there is a substantial seal breach one will notice lower bass notes are subdued. At the same time, the AKG are more comfortable and have a wider soundstage that's perceived as coming from in front rather than from inside the listener's head. Frequency response (tonal balance) is the most sound-determining aspect of headphones. This way the plots are overlaid and it is easier to show the tonal balance differences.The headphone does not react much to higher output resistances other than in level (9.4dB). The AKG K702 are great, comfortable headphones for critical listening but are mediocre for everyday casual use. This test measures the frequency response at various SPL (70, 80, 90 and 97dB) and then overlay the plots to see if the driver shows non linear behavior due to damping or other problems. AKG K7XX Red. Nunc pulvinar sollicitudin … As I've already mentioned, the AKG family sound has a tendency to brightness, and in the K612 and K702, this manifests itself as a brash and occasionally gritty emphasis on the upper mids. Bass extension isn’t great and it starts to audibly roll-off from 100Hz down. I've read it's bassier than the Q701. Graph Sitemap. The AKG K371 headphones are very similar to the AKG K361 model. A ‘horizontal‘ frequency response curve on the shown frequency response plots on this website thus indicates a perceived ‘flat’ tonal signature. Treble has some sparkle but isn’t sibilant or harsh, mids are darn near perfect, and there is bass roll off but it’s a textured and detailed bass. For the going streetprices (around € 140.-) this is a good and comfortable headphone that can take a beating. Around 2kHz there is a little lingering (the small bump in the FR, it seems happy to vibrate at that frequency) but is very low in level. It just doesn’t play very loud directly from a  phone and requires quite some volume for the bass to ‘snap’ into the correct level (Fletcher Munson / equal loudness contour curves) IEM Graph Comparison Tool (Premium) Headphone Graph Comparison Tool. The open back ear cups are large and circular and covered in a suede-like padding that gives the headphones a premium appeal. The 2nd harmonic distortion is probably lower than 0.2% around 1kHz as limits of the test rig are around that level. The K702 have a detachable cable that is easily replaceable if damaged, which makes them a bit more durable and better-built, but that’s about it. Update: AKG has also K702 model (around 950-1000plz) – also pretty good with detachable cable (potential for upgrades!) It is an open headphone with a detachable cable, slightly slanted pads and a different color scheme. While the Sennheiser have slightly less low-bass than the AKG, they have a better-balanced treble range and are more stable on the head. The AKG K240 Studio over-ear, semi-open headphones are designed for professional applications such as mixing, mastering and playback. Beyond 1ms the signal drops gradually and shows the bass roll-off. Below the square-wave response of the K702. Collapsible: no On the other hand, the AKG don't feel as tight as the Beyerdynamic, which is more comfortable for long listening sessions. The AKG K701 is a an oldie. Sound-wise, the AKG might lack a bit of sub-bass when compared to the Beyerdynamic and could sound a bit sharper on higher frequencies. Also, the detachable cable locks into the ear cups and will pull the headphones off your head before disconnecting if ever it's hooked on something. Frequency response graphs are your friend here. Bass hardly reacts. The AKG K701 look almost identical to the K702 and K712 PRO. The cable isn’t thin, but also not ‘audiophile thick’, and 3m in length and just mildly microphonic. The biggest improvement is in the frequency response. The AKG K612 is the successor of the K601. The AKG Q701 are basically the same headphones as the AKG K702, but with slightly better sound performance. The AKG are also a bit more open-sounding, and they come with a very long and detachable cable while the Beyerdynamic have a short, coiled cable. The black/dark-blue and chrome accents give it a different look compared to the white K701. With some music there is sibilance. They will sound great with high-res audio and an amp. The K702 is not difficult to drive though with its 62Ω impedance. The elevated upper mids and treble that is responsible for the bright character can be lowered to normal levels using a passive electronic filter. As the seal of a headphone is of importance some experiments are done to see the effect. AKG Pro K702 has a frequency response of 10 Hz to 39,800 Hz. ... Not joking. Long ago, the K701/702 were both designed and manufactured in Austria. L and R markings are located on the headband. Long ago, the K701/702 were both designed and manufactured in Austria. It is a bit bass light but the bass itself sounds excellent and well textured. The AKG K712 PRO and the AKG K702 are almost identical save for a few differences in design and frequency response. Drum hits etc. Adaptatio… It can also be used for the K612 and K701. These headphones are not tight enough and will easily fall your head if used while running. This plot looks quite good below 500Hz. There is hardly any difference. The cable has a 3-pin mini XLR on the headphone side and a goldplated 3.5mm TRS with a gold plated screw-on 6.3mm adapter. Cable entry: left sided. the K701 pads are pretty fresh. No cherry-picked units sent by brands. The AKG K240 Studio and K240 MKII use the same drivers and have the same frequency responses. Usually I don’t post them unless something is wrong but in this case I will post the plot. But at least the bass is more pronounced and the efficiency is about 4dB higher and fulle sounding. There still is a resonance which the filter can not remove. However, the headband has a lot of moving parts for the adjustable padding. This headphone is quite comfortable and can be worn for long periods without getting too ‘hot’ on the ears. The only real longevity issue is the elastic bands that aren’t easily replaced by owners. As far as AKG goes, I'd only briefly auditioned their cans in passing ... as the enclosure seems to vibrate a lot when the bass comes in. It does not push hard on my head but one does feel a small contact point and the cups have a small tendency to drop a little lower in my case. We’ll get into that in a bit. The Sennheiser HD 600 and the AKG K702 are both open-back, over-ear headphones that are similarly suited for critical listening. The 100μs pulse shows the correct amplitude but the pulse on the top of the signal shows overshoot and a quite high second pulse that should not be there. The mids from 200Hz to 1kHz are pretty flat and make the mids sound ‘neutral’. Below the frequency response of the K702 with the filter. Efficiency: 90dB/1mW (103dB/1V) Graphs 101: How to Read Headphone Measurements . Bass mids and treble are well balanced, and the well-designed, large and open earcups give these headphones a spacious soundstage. 160 St-Viateur Est, Suite 408, Montreal, Canada, H2T 1A8. The AKG K712 Pro is a direct descendent of the classic K701, using a very similar physical design, ... as seen in the frequency response graph. Due to their open-back design, these headphones don't offer any isolation below 1KHz. AKG K702 = a proper open back, sounds absolutely amazing straight out the box, perhaps a shade lacking in volume level due to the 200mW drivers, the sub bass interferes with the vocals, backing the volume off a little solves that. You want flat because then the sound your working on is actually there in the audio and it will translate better to other speakers and systems. The K702 has been around for many years already, just like the DT880 and HD650 and have been surpassed as ‘TOTL’ headphones for these brands but still are good performers. On a higher output resistance amplifier the output level will be considerably lower. Max. They do not fold up into a more compact format, and the ear cups do not lay flat to take less space either. ALL measurements are made with a good SEAL on a flatbed measurement rig. This tool will clearly show you the differences, Use our data and table to find the best headphones for your needs, Want to see us review a specific headphones? Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. frequency response graphs, … I sent an email to AKG asking if the design had been modified in order to make it more appealing to the larger numbers of audiophiles at the expense of the relatively small number of recording studio enthusiasts. What’s clearly visible is that AKG stuck to the AKG house sound over all the years. Impedance They're best used for critical listening in private. In-Ear Fidelity is supported by the following: Support those who support us! Hey bloke! Below the distortion measurements of the K702 (Right channel)Below the same distortion plot but with the vertical scale in percentages instead of level differences. Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. This led me to suspect that the first graph refers to the K702 that was made in Austria, whilst the second is related to the later Chinese manufactured version. Below the CSD of the K702. Awesome graphs, thanks for that - Yeah it'd make sense for them to use the new (at the time) pads in some ongoing designs. The ‘details’ in the music are ‘fake’ due to the 6.5kHz peak. beyerdynamic DT 990 pro VS. AKG K702 Advice. Published: Feb-3-2020, updated: Aug-8-2020. Be part of the most informed community and take advantage of our advanced tools to find the best product for your needs. Hi, this is a comment.... on Hello world! Not designed for office use, unless you work in an isolated environment. The K702 are comfortable and reproduce tracks with great fidelity. This also points toward less refined treble. Thank you so much for this. AKG K701. The step response plot below  (Left, Right)This plot shows the impulse response/clarity is accentuated and peaks out 4dB above the mids. Close but no cigar. They're super comfortable headphones with a few more accessories than the K701 or the K702.However, like the previous models, they're a bit bulky and cumbersome for everyday use. Below the frequency response of the K702 (Left, Right)There is a slight but not audible channel imbalance.

Kalimba Married Life, Svp 4 Crack Reddit, Terme De Poker 6 Lettres, Pass Numerus Clausus, Scierie Bois Hainaut, Arreter Au Passage Mots Fléchés, épagneul à Vendre, Les Causes De L'inégalité Homme Femme,